![]() ![]() The default desktop, should be quite familiar to anyone who's used any kind of desktop interface. The one thing I've found about LXLE Linux is that the installation is a bit slower than the rest of the entries here (mostly because of downloading issues), while at the same time being one of the easiest. LXLE offers quite a nice desktop (especially for a lightweight distribution) that includes all the software you need to be productive or entertain yourself. It doesnt support as many features as Cinnamon or MATE, but its extremely stable and very light on resource. LXLE Linux is built on the most recent version of Ubuntu Linux and uses the LXLE desktop environment to create an operating system that's very lightweight, simple to install, and easy to use. Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment. Of all the lightweight Linux distributions, Tiny Core can run on the oldest hardware. The minimum system requirements for Tiny Core Linux are:ĭo note, however, that the recommended minimum configuration for Tiny Core Linux is a Pentium II CPU and 128 MB of ram. Tiny Core does support virtual desktops, sticky windows, and includes a Control Panel for configuring the likes of backup/restore, services, date/time, mouse, network, and more. Like Puppy Linux, I don't recommend Tiny Core Linux to those who are new to Linux, as it's not nearly as straightforward as you might think.Īlso: The best Linux distros for beginners Since you will surely meet your other requirement:īy installing a basic or minimal Arch or Ubuntu, and then meet your first mentioned requirement:The Tiny Core Linux default desktop offers side title bars similar to those you can configure with AfterStep. Phanmetal, I wonder whether you've really answered your own question with your requirement: So, essentially, judging systems by the amount of RAM they use can be a fraught matter. It's also worth considering that RAM usage in linux is designed to use RAM optimally which means that in many cases it will use as much RAM as there is, if it needs to, but if there wasn't that much of it, its Memory Management processes optimise to use whatever there is so in practical terms it may achieve with less RAM just about what it does with more, but if there is more, it'll use it in accordance with the optimisations built into the kernel. ![]() In modern computing, RAM usage has become less of an issue for many users because it's not as expensive as it once was. There's no XFCE here, though it can always be installed. The least RAM intensive fully-functioning systems I have used are formed from minimal Debian bases and then using suckless utilities like dwm, st and surf. The main challenge in starting from basics and then adding what you want to the system, is the learning of how to do it, but with packet managers in Arch and Debian, it's greatly assisted. So you have the choice of accepting their versions of a linux system, or making your own depending on how much compromise you are willing to make in relation to RAM usage as you find it. Their aims however, may not coincide with yours, which in this case is "uses very little Ram". The difference in this approach rather than choosing an existing distribution running XFCE, is that the user avoids the overheads and additional programming that the distribution developers have chosen to include in their distro, which they pretty much all do to accomplish particular aims that they have. ![]() ![]() In the case of Arch, that's a common approach, but with Ubuntu, it might be more economical to begin with Debian since it underpins Ubuntu, but it may not make much difference there. One way of achieving minimal RAM usage, is accomplished by installing a basic or minimal installation and then progressively adding what the user wants, such as X or wayland and then XFCE in your case. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |